14 April 2026 :

April 13, 2026 - IRAN. 4 protesters sentenced to death
Mohammadreza Majidi-Asl, Bita Hemmati, Behrouz Zamaninejad (Behrouz Zamani Nejad), and Kourosh Zamaninejad (Kourosh Zamani Nejad)
Mohammadreza Majidi-Asl, Bita Hemmati, Behrouz Zamaninejad, and Kourosh Zamaninejad, all detained during the January protests, have been sentenced by Branch 26 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court to death, five years in prison, and confiscation of all assets. Amir Hemmati, the fifth defendant in the case, has also been sentenced to five years and eight months in prison.

According to a ruling recently issued by Branch 26 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court, presided over by Judge Iman Afshari, and formally communicated to the defendants, Mohammadreza Majidi-Asl, Bita Hemmati, Behrouz Zamaninejad, and Kourosh Zamaninejad were sentenced to death on the charge of “operational action for the hostile government of the United States and hostile groups.” These four defendants were also each sentenced to five years of discretionary imprisonment on the charge of “assembly and collusion against national security.” The ruling additionally imposed confiscation of all their assets as a supplementary punishment.

Regarding the verdict issued against Amir Hemmati, the fifth defendant in the case, he was sentenced to five years of discretionary imprisonment on the charge of “assembly and collusion against national security,” as well as eight months in prison for “propaganda against the regime.”

A knowledgeable source close to the families of these prisoners told HRANA: “Mohammadreza Majidi-Asl and Bita Hemmati are a couple living in Tehran, and Amir Hemmati is a relative of the two. Kourosh Zamaninejad and Behrouz Zamaninejad were living in the same residential building, and their arrests took place simultaneously.”

According to the text of the ruling, the allegations against these individuals include “participation in protest gatherings on January 8 and 9, 2026,” “chanting protest slogans,” “throwing objects including bottles, concrete blocks, and incendiary materials from rooftops,” and “destruction of public property.” It is also claimed that these acts were carried out with the aim of “disrupting national security” and in connection with “hostile groups.”

In another section of the ruling, Judge Afshari referred to “the use of explosive materials and an unspecified weapon,” “injuring forces deployed at the scene,” and “sending content aimed at undermining security.” However, in the text of the verdict, a copy of which has been obtained by HRANA, the details of these allegations and the precise attribution of each act to each defendant have not been presented separately or transparently.

According to information obtained by HRANA, the defendants were subjected to pressure during interrogation, and concerns have been raised regarding the possibility of forced confessions during that period.

The ruling was issued based on several legal provisions, including Articles 131 and 134 of the Islamic Penal Code, as well as Articles 500 and 610 (propaganda against the regime and assembly and collusion against national security). The combination of these charges with the imposition of the death penalty, especially in cases linked to public protests, has been the subject of serious scrutiny and criticism by human rights bodies in recent years.

In this case, the use of broadly framed charges, the lack of individualized details regarding the role of each defendant, and reports concerning possible coerced confessions are among the issues that, according to legal experts, may raise serious questions about the judicial process. Under international standards, the use of the death penalty requires clear evidence and the precise establishment of the “most serious crimes.”

As of the time of this report, no information has been released regarding the defendants’ access to counsel of their choosing, the details of the court sessions, or their conditions of detention. HRANA continues to follow developments in this case.