Year
How to use the database
HANDS OFF CAIN’S 2015 REPORT
The worldwide situation (as of 30 June 2016)
EXECUTIONS IN 2014
EXECUTIONS IN 2015 (as of 30 June)
The most important facts of 2015 (and the first six months of 2016)
ADDRESS of Pope Francis
THE SMILING FACE OF THE MULLAHS
Reportage by Sergio D'Elia
ANALYSIS OF THE 2015 REPORT DATA AND OBJECTIVES OF HANDS OFF CAIN
Reportage by Marco Perduca
"THE ABOLITIONIST OF THE YEAR 2015” AWARD
Protocol of understanding between NTC and CNF
Dossier on death penalty and homosexuality
Final declaration of the Cairo workshop
Goals
Achievements
GENERAL MOTION OF THE FIFTH CONGRESS OF HOC
RESOLUTION OF THE KIGALI CONFERENCE
U.N. RESOLUTION 2014

U.N. RESOLUTION 2012
U.N. RESOLUTION 2010

REPORT ON THE 2ND ANNUAL EU FORUM ON THE DEATH PENALTY IN ZAMBIA

Videos

DECLARATION OF LIBREVILLE

Publications
Hands Off Cain Headquarters
U.N. RESOLUTION 2008

U.N. RESOLUTION 2007

Appeal To The United Nations
Board of Directors

LETHAL TRADE DOSSIER
2014 FREETOWN CONFERENCE Final Declaration
THE COTONOU DECLARATION 2014
DOSSIER IRAQ 2003

DOSSIER ON MORATORIUM
DOSSIER IRAQ 2012

DOSSIER USA 2011

NOBEL LAUREATES APPEAL
Bulletin Board
Sign up
Join appeal
Newsletter
Our Publications

UNITED KINGDOM SUPREME COURT RULES BRITAIN CANNOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE TO U.S. FOR USE IN DEATH-PENALTY CASES

March 28, 2020:

In a decision that exposed the deep divide between the United States and its European allies on capital punishment issues, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom unanimously ruled that the British government unlawfully provided information to the United States about two suspected Islamic State members without first obtaining assurances that the information would not be used to impose or carry out the death penalty. 
Captured by a Kurdish militia in Syria in early 2018, the detainees, El Shafee Elsheikh and Alexanda Kotey, are being held by the American military in Iraq. The landmark ruling, issued March 25, 2020 in the case of Elgizouli v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, requires British authorities to withhold from the United States any evidence that the United States could use to prosecute Shafee El Sheikh and Alexander Kotey—two British Islamic State detainees accused of murdering U.S. and British captives—because U.S. officials had refused to rule out pursuit of the death penalty in their cases. “No further assistance should be given for the purpose of any proceedings” against El Sheikh and Kotey “in the United States of America,” Lord Brian Kerr wrote for the Court, “without the appropriate death penalty assurances.” The U.S. State Department did not offer immediate comment on the ruling.
Human rights organizations and international capital defense organizations praised the U.K. high court’s decision. The London-based Death Penalty Project, which the Court permitted to intervene in the lawsuit, described the decision’s importance as “wider than just this case.” The organization’s Co-Executive Director Parvais Jabbar said the ruling “has implications for any individual who may be facing the death penalty and concerns what assurances the U.K. Government must seek before deciding what help or assistance it may give. These are fundamental issues concerning the right to life. The UK abolished the death penalty over 50 years ago and the Government must hold true to its commitment to oppose capital punishment in all circumstances and as a matter of principle.”
Maya Foa, Director of the international human rights organization, Reprieve, assailed the British government’s actions that led to the lawsuit. “By sharing information without first seeking—and securing—assurances that the death penalty wouldn’t be in play, this government acted unlawfully,” she said. “In doing so they undermined the U.K.’s strong assistance for people facing capital punishment across the globe, and so put hundreds of lives at risk.” 
El Sheikh and Kotey are accused of kidnapping, torture, and 27 murders as members of the Islamic State. In 2018, after the U.S. had twice refused to provide assurances that it would not seek the death penalty, then-U.K. Home Secretary Sajid Javid nevertheless agreed to share information on the two prisoners. The British government then provided approximately 600 witness statements and other evidence to U.S. prosecutors for use in their trials. In his judgment for the Court, Lord Kerr characterized the government’s decision to share the information as one “based on political expediency, rather than strict necessity.”
The U.K. government had argued that refusing to share the information without assurance against the death penalty would strain diplomatic relations between the two countries, but the Court rebutted that assertion. “There is no evidence that the insistence on assurances in the case of extradition or deportation has led to any rupture in the relations between the two countries,” it wrote. “Moreover, several other countries have required assurances without any evidence of negative consequences (for example, Germany’s requiring an assurance before providing Mutual Legal Assistance for the federal prosecution of Zacarias Moussaoui, one of the 9/11 conspirators).”
In her opinion in the case, Baroness Brenda Hale expressed the broad importance of the Court’s decision. “The most fundamental of the rights protected by the European convention [on human rights],” Justice Hale wrote, “is the right to life. This is an absolute right, not qualified by the possibility of restrictions or interferences which are ‘necessary in a democratic society’.”
Stressing that principle, Lord Kerr argued that “the time has arrived where a common law principle should be recognised whereby it is deemed unlawful to facilitate the trial of any individual in a foreign country where, to do so, would put that person in peril of being executed.”
The U.K. already bans extradition of prisoners without assurances that they will not face the death penalty.
In reacting to the ruling, a Home Office spokesperson said, “The government’s priority has always been to maintain national security and to deliver justice for the victims and their families. This has not changed. We are clearly very disappointed with today’s judgment and are carefully considering next steps.”
The court’s decision, however, took direct aim at what it considered a hollow invocation of the victims’ interests. “The families wished to avoid the application of the death penalty,” the Court said. “The species of justice that the families wished to have was one where there was not the possibility of the imposition of the death penalty. The decision not to seek assurances opened up that very possibility. To fulfil their wishes, it was surely required that the hallowed practice of seeking death penalty assurances be observed.”
The case is named for Maha Elgizouli, El Sheikh’s mother, who challenged the U.K. government’s abandonment of its long-standing opposition to capital punishment in her son’s case. In a statement, her solicitor said, Elgizouli “has always expressed her belief that her son, if accused, should face justice—and that any trial should take place in the U.K.” where he would not face the death penalty. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had initially asserted that there was not enough evidence to try the two men in the U.K., but has since changed its stance.
The ruling in a lawsuit was a major setback for senior law-enforcement officials in both countries. The British government had stripped the two men of their citizenship and had agreed to share evidence about them for use in an American trial without assurances that they would not face capital punishment, even though Britain has abolished the death penalty.
“No further assistance should be given for the purpose of any proceedings” against the men “in the United States of America without the appropriate death penalty assurances,” Justice Brian Kerr wrote.
The fate of the 2 detainees has been a fraught question since an American-backed Kurdish militia, the Syrian Democratic Forces, captured them. In October, when the Turkish military moved into northern Syria after getting a green light from President Trump, the American military took custody of them from a Kurdish prison and has been holding them in Iraq.
“This is a big deal,” said Robert M. Chesney, a University of Texas national-security law professor. “The decision is a tremendous blow to the U.S. government’s plan to prosecute the Beatles in an American court. Of course, the problem could be solved by focusing on a life sentence and giving up on the death penalty. But that is a bitter pill to swallow given the enormity of their crimes.”
Indeed, the ruling raised the question of whether Attorney General William P. Barr would change the stance insisted upon by his predecessor, Jeff Sessions, and agree that the maximum penalty that American prosecutors would seek against the 2 men was life in prison. That would resolve the problem keeping British officials from sharing the key evidence.
Marc Raimondi, a Justice Department spokesman, expressed disappointment with the ruling and said law enforcement officials were considering their next move.
But the 7 justices on the British Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the British home secretary’s decision to transfer personal data to law enforcement authorities abroad for use in capital criminal proceedings without any safeguards violated a data protection law passed in 2018.
1 of the 4, Mohammed Emwazi, was killed in an airstrike in 2015 in Syria. Known as Jihadi John, he is believed to have personally beheaded American and British hostages. A 4th, Aine Davis, is imprisoned in Turkey on terrorism charges. The extradition of Mr. Davis to the United States seems unlikely as the American-Turkish relationship continues to deteriorate.
The British extremists were known for their brutality. They repeatedly beat the hostages they kept imprisoned in Raqqa, Syria, formerly the Islamic State’s self-declared capital, and subjected them to waterboarding and mock executions.
In addition to killing Mr. Foley, Mr. Emwazi was believed to have killed the American journalist Steven J. Sotloff as well as Abdul-Rahman Kassig, an aid worker. The American government says the group beheaded more than 27 hostages.
The constellation of opinions in the British Supreme Court case offers no sympathy for the two detainees. “It is difficult to imagine more horrific murders than those which Mr. Elsheikh and Mr. Kotey are alleged to have carried out,” Justice Kerr wrote, calling their alleged crimes “monstrous” and “heinous.”
If brought to the United States, the men have been expected to face charges in federal court in Northern Virginia.
Any trial would probably involve former hostages, especially from Italy, France, Spain and Denmark, testifying and recounting the horrors they experienced while imprisoned by the Islamic State in Syria.
All 4 men had lived in West London. Mr. Kotey, born in London, is of Ghanaian and Greek Cypriot background, while Mr. Elsheikh’s family fled Sudan in the 1990s. Both men have been designated foreign terrorists by the United States.

(Sources: DPIC, The Times of London, BBC News, The Guardian, The Independent, New York Times, Associated Press, Courthouse News Service, 25/03/2020)

SOMALILAND: PRESIDENT TO RELEASE 800 PRISONERS IN COMBATING COVID-19
INDIA: GUJARAT MAN GETS DEATH PENALTY FOR RAPING, KILLING 3-YEAR-OLD GIRL
JAPAN: DEATH PENALTY FINALIZED FOR 2016 SAGAMIHARA CARE HOME MASS MURDERER
BOTSWANA: TWO MEN EXECUTED FOR MURDER
ZIMBABWE: PRESIDENT MNANGAGWA PARDONS 5,000 PRISONERS AS HE ORDERS 21-DAY LOCKDOWN
EGYPT: 5 SENTENCED TO DEATH OVER DAMAGING PIPELINE, CAUSING 9 DEATHS
SRI LANKA: PRESIDENT PARDONS SOLDIER WHO KILLED TAMIL CIVILIANS
YEMEN: HOUTHI REBELS PARDON BAHA'I SENTENCED TO DEATH, RELEASE ALL MINORITY GROUP PRISONERS
JAPAN: HANGED EX-AUM MEMBER URGED WOULD-BE TERRORISTS TO HALT ATTACKS
IRAN: 70 POLITICAL PRISONERS IN TEHRAN AND KARAJ PROTEST SPREAD OF CORONAVIRUS
A DAY AFTER NIRBHAYA CONVICTS' EXECUTION, UN ASKS STATES TO 'HALT USE OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT'
NIGERIA: SIX DEATH SENTENCES FOR MURDER IN EKITI
UAE: COURT UPHOLDS DEATH SENTENCE OF FATHER WHO SEXUALLY ABUSED DAUGHTER
CHINA: COURT HANDS RARE DEATH SENTENCE TO RAPIST WHO HELD GIRL CAPTIVE FOR 24 DAYS
USA: COLORADO ABOLISHES DEATH PENALTY
NORTH KOREA: SMUGGLER EXECUTED AFTER CROSSING SINO-NORTH KOREAN BORDER
YEMEN: HOUTHI-RUN COURT UPHOLDS DEATH SENTENCE AGAINST BAHA’I PRISONER OF CONSCIENCE
ZIMBABWE: SERIAL RAPIST SENTENCED TO DEATH FOR MURDER
IRAN: ANOTHER NOVEMBER PROTESTER SENTENCED TO DEATH
SYRIA: PRESIDENT ASSAD ISSUES AMNESTY, REDUCES SENTENCES
IRAN: SUPREME LEADER TO PARDON 10,000 INCLUDING POLITICAL PRISONERS
INDIA: FOUR MEN EXECUTED FOR BRUTAL 2012 DELHI BUS RAPE AND MURDER
PAKISTAN: COURT AWARDS DEATH PENALTY IN MURDER CASE IN SARGODHA
NIGERIA: MAN GETS DEATH SENTENCE FOR STEALING TWO PHONES, WRISTWATCHES
PAKISTAN: MURDER ACCUSED GETS DEATH SENTENCE
JAPAN: CARE HOME MASS MURDERER WILL NOT APPEAL DEATH PENALTY RULING
YEMEN: PRO-HOUTHI COURT SENTENCES 19 SENIOR ARMY OFFICERS TO DEATH
USA: UPDATES ON GUANTÁNAMO BAY
BANGLADESH: FATHER, UNCLE GET DEATH PENALTY FOR THE MURDER OF FIVE-YEAR-OLD CHILD
INDIA: 3 CONVICTS GET DEATH PENALTY FOR GANG RAPE, MURDER OF MINOR GIRL IN 4-DAY TRIAL

1 2 3 [Succ >>]
2021
january
february
  2020
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2019
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2018
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2017
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
 
2016
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2015
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2014
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2013
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2012
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2011
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
 
2010
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2009
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2008
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2007
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2006
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
  2005
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
 
2004
january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
 
IRAN - Hands off Cain Year End Report: At least 284 executions in 2020
  IRAN: HANDS OFF CAIN, THE HANGING OF THE PROTESTER MOSTAFA SALEHI IS A SHAME FOR THE SO-CALLED DEMOCRATIC WORLD   
  USA: ‘BLACK LIVES MATTER’, BUT IS IT ONLY RACISM?  
  IRAN. HANDS OFF CAIN, REDUCTION OF DRUG EXECUTIONS BUT NUMBERS REMAIN WORRISOME  
  HUMAN RIGHTS: DEMONSTRATION OF THE RADICAL PARTY BEFORE IRANIAN EMBASSY 14 FEBRUARY  
  BELARUS EXECUTES TWO CONVICTED MURDERERS  
news
-
latest actions
-
data base
-
actions
-
who we are
-
registered users
-
credits